The Christian Science Monitor posted a fascinating article this morning - "Why 10,000 Ugandans are Eagerly Serving in Iraq."
Not only have 10,000 Ugandans already served in Iraq, but thousands more dream of doing the same. And, if President Obama withdraws U.S. troops from Iraq, Ugandans will set their sights on Afghanistan.
Ugandans are apparently good candidates for service, as many speak English (Uganda is a former British colony), are impoverished (the country is among the world's 20 poorest), and have experience (a 20-year conflict has produced a large population of army veterans). But perhaps most importantly, they are willing to work cheaply: Ugandans earn an average of $600 per month for the same job that would earn an American $15,000 per month. Even when accounting for the low cost of living in Uganda, these two figures are astonishingly inequitable. Many Ugandan soldiers in Iraq resent the fact that multi-billion dollar corporations are profiting from their cheap labor.
One cannot help but argue that anybody should make more than $600 per month for putting their life on the line. But, to Ugandans, from a country where this meager wage goes a long way, it is adequate compensation. One returned soldier reported building two houses, buying a bar, and increasing the size of his cow herd and banana plantation with one year's earnings.
Paying Ugandans $15,000 per month would also create problems at home. Most Ugandans cannot even fathom earning $15,000 in a year, much less in a month. If thousands of Ugandans were to return home with that much money, the country's inequality would skyrocket, creating new tensions.
Yet is it fair for the same company to pay a Ugandan four percent of what it pays an American for the same job? Hardly.